OASIS+ Phase II Financial Services Domain: Scoring, Compliance, And Win Strategy

If your federal work touches accounting, audit, budgeting, grants, fraud prevention, transaction processing, or financial risk, the OASIS+ Financial Services domain may be the right lane for you. This page is not a DIY guide. Its purpose is to help you quickly determine whether you are a fit—and what “readiness” looks like—so you can decide whether to pursue an Eligibility Assessment, a consultation, and/or a teaming path.

What OASIS+ Financial Services Domain Covers

The Financial Services domain includes the following scope areas:

• Accounting services
• Audit services (General/Financial)
• Budget formulation, execution, and analysis
• Cost estimating & analysis services
• Financial data analytics and reporting
• Grant management
• Economic and financial advisory services
• Financial fraud detection and prevention
• Financial transaction processing and reconciliation
• Credit and debt management
• Loan portfolio management and servicing
• Financial risk management

A practical way to read this list is: agencies buy financial operations support (accounting/audit), planning and execution support
(budgeting/cost), compliance-oriented support (grants, controls, audit readiness), and transaction/risk work (processing,
reconciliation, fraud prevention, credit/debt, portfolio servicing, risk management). If your past performance lines up with one
or more of these areas, you likely have a legitimate “domain fit” starting point.

Is This Domain Right For You?

The following organization profiles are commonly aligned to this domain:

• CPA firms with experience supporting federal financial operations
• Consulting firms with grant, audit, and compliance services
• Vendors supporting financial systems integration or data analytics
• Contractors migrating from Schedule 520 work to OASIS+
• Small businesses supporting OMB A-123 or internal controls
• Firms that provide audit readiness and risk assessments
• Organizations working with CFO Act agencies or DoD financial management
• Businesses with GAGAS-compliant past performance
• JV or mentor-protégé teams in financial advisory services
• Subcontractors seeking to partner with large primes in the finance domain

If you recognize your team in several bullets above, that’s a positive sign. But “fit” alone is not the same as “competitiveness.”
OASIS+ evaluation is driven by what you can substantiate. That is why many firms start with an assessment to validate whether
their strongest projects and supporting artifacts align to how they intend to score.

NAICS Alignment For Eligibility And Classification

The OASIS+ Financial Services domain is associated with the following NAICS codes:

Because this page is designed to help you evaluate fit and readiness (not to walk you through submission mechanics), the key
takeaway is simple: your domain alignment should be consistent with your actual work performed and how you expect to support
your scoring claims with evidence.

Readiness Signals That Commonly Matter

In OASIS+ Financial Services scoring discussions, three readiness signals appear repeatedly: government-approved systems,
facility clearance, and specific certifications. These items do not apply the same way to every company, but they often surface
as differentiators in how firms position and substantiate their submission.

Government-Approved Systems

On the Unrestricted track, “Other Systems” (including an accounting system) are explicitly recognized. The systems referenced include:

• Accounting system
• Approved rates (e.g., forward pricing/billing)
• Purchasing system
• Estimating system
• EVMS
• Material management and accounting system
• Property management system

For the Unrestricted track, having two government-approved systems supports one credit and having three or more supports a second credit
(maximum two points under that subfactor). For credit, the systems must be government approved, including the accounting system.

Facility Clearance

Facility clearance is addressed directly:

• You receive 1 point if your company has an active facility clearance of Top Secret or Secret.
• There is no point difference between Top Secret and Secret; either earns the point.
• If your facility clearance is in a pending state at the time of proposal submission, it is not accepted for this credit.

Other Certifications

The following certifications are listed for this domain scoring discussion:

• CMMI (Level 2 or higher)
• ISO 27001:2022 (Information Security)
• ISO 9001:2015 (Quality Management)
• CMMC (Level 2 or higher)

This subfactor is structured as one point per listed certification up to a maximum of 4 points for Small Business and 3 points for Unrestricted.

Special Case: Mentor–Protégé JVs In Financial Services

If you are considering a Mentor–Protégé JV, several Financial Services–specific rules materially affect how thresholds work, and they are worth
validating early—before you commit to a scoring posture that your evidence cannot support:

• For qualifying projects (QPs), at least one QP must come from the Protégé company.
• The minimum threshold annual value for each domain is halved when a Protégé submits a contract.
• For Financial Services Small Business, an example is: a minimum annual value of $500K for QP contracts becomes above $250K when the Protégé contract is used.
• The same halving concept applies to higher annual value thresholds used for additional scale credit (example shown: $2M becomes $1M for the Protégé).
• The same rule applies to Federal Experience Projects (FEPs) and task orders under MA-IDIQs (example shown: $250K becomes $125K when coming from the Protégé).
• The same concept applies on Unrestricted submissions as well (example shown: above $500K for the Protégé’s contract under Financial Services UNR).

Pricing Note For Context

Cost/price forms and pricing information are mandatory for submission. Pricing has no points attached and is reviewed on an
Acceptable/Non-Acceptable basis. The pricing form structure referenced is the J.P-9 form covering 20 different labor categories at the SME level over
a total period of 16 years (you input the first year). The ceiling rates are applicable to sole-source T&M/LH task orders only; for everything else,
pricing is provided at the task order level. Ceiling rates do not include Secret/Top Secret or OCONUS additions. One price proposal is required for all
labor categories across domains.

What To Gather Before You Claim Anything

For Financial Services, strong candidates are typically the ones who can demonstrate not only domain-aligned work, but also the
ability to substantiate every scoring claim with defensible documentation. If you are unsure whether your artifacts support your
planned narrative, start with an assessment rather than guessing.

Partnering As A Practical Path

If you are strong in capability but light in the right kind of documented project evidence—or you are evaluating whether a JV or
teaming approach makes sense—then partnering can be an intentional strategy rather than a last resort. Acceptable structures include JVs, Mentor–Protégé
JVs, and prime/sub relationships. In scoring, partner contracts can be used for both QPs and FEPs, which account for the large majority of the available
points. For Small Business submissions, subcontractors must be small under this domain; multiple subcontractors can be used across QPs and FEPs.

Next Step: Choose The Fastest Path To Clarity

If you want a direct, evidence-grounded answer on whether you should pursue this domain—and what gaps would weaken your
submission—start with an Eligibility Assessment. If you want to talk through positioning, SB vs UNR considerations, and teaming
options first, book a consultation.

FAQ